مجله پژوهش‌های کارآفرینی

مجله پژوهش‌های کارآفرینی

ارائه الگویی از عوامل حیاتی موفقیت بازاریابی کارآفرینانه در کسب‌وکارهای اینترنتی

نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان
گروه مدیریت، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه حضرت معصومه(س)، قم، ایران.
چکیده
مقدمه: یکی از محیط‌های در حال نوسان، محیط اینترنت برای کسب‌و‌کارهای اینترنتی است. بررسی فعالیت‌های تجاری صورت گرفته، انجام بیش از یک میلیارد خرید را در بیش از 34 کشور نشان می‌دهد که این مسئله از رشد انفجاری کسب‌و‌کارهای اینترنتی در سراسر جهان حکایت دارد. نکته مهمی که در اینجا مطرح می‌شود توانایی‌های منحصربه‌فرد اینترنت برای استفاده از مدل‌های بازاریابی جدید کسب‌وکار، ارزش‌های جدید برای مشتری و منابع و منافع متعدد برای کارآفرینان است که وجه تمایز با کسب‌و‌کارهای سنتی و فیزیکی است؛ چراکه در کسب‌وکارهای سنتی و فیزیکی استفاده از مدل‌های کسب‌و‌کار و ارزش‌های جدید محدودتر است. این تمایز در بستر بازاریابی را در کسب‌و‌کارهای سنتی و اینترنتی می‌توان در رویکرد بازاریابی کارآفرینانه جستجو کرد؛ چراکه بستر بازاریابی کارآفرینانه در کسب‌وکارهای اینترنتی، اینترنت و در کسب‌وکارهای سنتی، محیط فیزیکی است و همین امر موجب‌شده کسب‌وکارهای اینترنتی با سرعت بیشتری رشد کنند. این در حالی است که تحقیقات زیادی در زمینه نقش بازاریابی کارآفرینانه به‌طور ویژه در کسب‌وکارهای اینترنتی صورت نگرفته است و لزوم توجه به این موضوع احساس می‌شود. هدف این پژوهش، شناسایی و سطح‌بندی عوامل حیاتی موفقیت بازاریابی کارآفرینانه در کسب‌وکارهای اینترنتی است.
روش‌شناسی: پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف، کاربردی و از نظر ماهیت روش نیز از نوع آمیخته اکتشافی ‌(کمی-کیفی) است که در بخش کیفی، عوامل حیاتی موفقیت بازاریابی کارآفرینانه در کسب‌وکارهای اینترنتی شناسایی و در بخش کمی این عوامل سطح‌بندی شدند. نمونه مورد مطالعه شامل 12 مدیر کسب‌و‌کارهای اینترنتی و 10 خبره دانشگاهی فعال در حوزه بازاریابی کارآفرینانه است که به روش گلوله‌برفی انتخاب شدند. ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها در بخش کیفی، مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته و در بخش کمی نیز پرسشنامه بود. برای روایی ابزار تحقیق از روایی سازه، روایی محتوا و روایی بیرونی و برای پایایی نیز از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ استفاده شده است.
یافته‌ها: پنج عامل اصلی حیاتی برای موفقیت بازاریابی کارآفرینانه شامل پاسخ‌گویی به محیط، کارآفرینی، منابع، زیرساخت فنی و زیرساخت فکری در قالب 14 مضمون فراگیر و 30 مضمون سازمان دهنده شناسایی شدند. متن مصاحبه‌ها با کمک نرم‌افزار اطلس، بازیابی و 80 کد اولیه از آن‌ها استخراج شد. مضامین فراگیر شامل ریسک‌پذیری، فرصت‌طلبی، نوآوری، رهبری، مشتری‌مداری، استفاده از منابع، فرهنگ، استراتژی، تاکتیک‌ها، خلق ارزش، فناوری، گستردگی ابزارها، سرمایه‌گذاری و انعطاف‌پذیری است. برای سطح‌بندی عوامل شناسایی شده از تکنیک مدل‌سازی ساختاری‌- ‌تفسیری استفاده شده است. نتایج سطح‌بندی نیز نشان داد که گستردگی ابزار، سرمایه‌گذاری و انعطاف‌پذیری در سطح یک، اهرم‌سازی منابع در سطح دو، فرهنگ، استراتژی، مشتری‌محوری و فناوری در سطح سه، تاکتیک در سطح چهار، پیشرو بودن و ارزش‌آفرینی در سطح پنج، ریسک‌پذیری، فرصت‌طلبی و نوآوری در سطح شش قرار گرفتند.
نتیجه‌گیری/ دستاوردها: با توجه به اهمیت عوامل موفقیت بازاریابی کارآفرینانه، کارآفرینان در کسب‌و‌کارهای اینترنتی باید تمرکز خود را بر این عوامل کلیدی متمرکز کرده و الگوهای موفقیت بازاریابی کارآفرینانه را بر اساس آن‌ها تطبیق دهند. این عوامل می‌توانند دستاوردهای زیادی را برای کسب‌و‌کارهای اینترنتی فراهم کنند و به آن‌ها کمک کنند تا در بازار رقابتی و پویا به موفقیت دست یابند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

A Pattern of Critical Success Factors of Entrepreneurial Marketing in E-Businesses

نویسندگان English

Vahid Sharafi
Mona Jamipour
Batoul Shah Mohammadi Komchali
Department of Management, Faculty of Humanities, University of Hazrat-e Masoumeh, Qom, Iran.
چکیده English

Introduction: The online environment for e-businesses is one of the fluctuating environments. A survey of business activities shows that more than one billion purchases have been made in more than 34 countries, indicating the explosive growth of e-businesses around the world. An essential point that is raised here is the unique capabilities of the Internet to use new business marketing models, create new values for customers, and provide numerous resources and benefits for entrepreneurs, distinguishing it from traditional and physical businesses in which new business and value models are applied more limitedly. This distinction in the marketing platform between traditional and e-businesses can be sought in the entrepreneurial marketing approach, because the Internet is the entrepreneurial marketing platform in e-businesses, whereas it is the physical environment in traditional businesses. This is a reason explaining why e-businesses are growing at a faster pace. However, research has been limited on the role of entrepreneurial marketing, especially in e-businesses. This study aimed to identify and categorize the critical factors of entrepreneurial marketing success in e-businesses.
Methodology: The research is an applied study in terms of purpose and an exploratory mixed-methods (quantitative-qualitative) study in terms of methodology. The critical factors of entrepreneurial marketing success in e-businesses were identified in the qualitative phase and were categorized in the quantitative phase. The statistical sample included 12 e-business managers and 10 academic experts active in the field of entrepreneurial marketing, selected by the snowball technique. The data collection instrument in the qualitative phase was semi-structured interviews and a questionnaire in the quantitative phase. The validity of the research instrument was checked by examining its construct validity, content validity, and external validity, whereas Cronbach's alpha coefficient was calculated to ensure its reliability.
Findings: Five critical factors of entrepreneurial marketing success including responsiveness to the environment, entrepreneurship, resources, technical infrastructure, and intellectual infrastructure were identified in the form of 14 comprehensive themes and 30 organizing themes. The interview scripts were retrieved with the help of Atlas software, and 80 primary codes were extracted from them. Overarching themes include risk-taking, opportunism, innovation, leadership, customer orientation, resource utilization, culture, strategy, tactics, value creation, technology, extent of tools, investment, and flexibility. The interpretive-structure modeling technique was used to categorize these factors. According to the results, the extent of tools, investment, and flexibility was categorized at level one; leveraging resources was categorized at level two; culture, strategy, customer-oriented, and technology were put at level three; tactics were categorized at level four; being proactive and value creation were placed at level five; and finally, risk-taking, opportunism, and innovation were placed at level six.
Conclusion/ Implications: Considering the importance of entrepreneurial marketing success factors, entrepreneurs in e-businesses should focus on these key factors and adapt entrepreneurial marketing success patterns based on them. These factors can provide many benefits to online businesses and help them succeed in a competitive and dynamic market.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Critical Success Factors
E-businesses
Entrepreneurial Marketing
Aghajani, H., & Shariati, Z. (2019). Explaining the evolutionary process and the factors affecting the e-business model in Iranian startups. Journal of Management Improvement, 14(1), 127-144. Doi: 10.22034/JMI.2020.106794. [In Persian]
Amiri, Y., Salarzahi, H., & Parish, R. (2022). Identifying and prioritizing factors affecting the implementation of e-business in small and medium-sized companies using fuzzy MADM. Change Management Journal, 3 (6), 55-80.  https://doi.org/10.22067/pmt.v0i0.15937. [In Persian]
Amjad, T.Dent, M. M., & Abu Mansor, N. N. (2023). A bibliometric analysis and text mining of the entrepreneurial marketing domain: emerging trends and future research directions. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 25 (3), 393-409. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRME-03-2021-0032. [In Persian]
Anvari, A. F., Alizadeh Thani, M., Shirkhodaei, M., & Valipour Khatir, M. (2018). Identifying the success factors of the Alibaba Internet company. Human Resource Management Research, 9(4), 2-22.  http://ormr.modares.ac.ir/article-28-33652-fa.html. [In Persian]
Azar, A., & Bayat, K. (2009). Designing a business process-oriented model with an interpretive structural modeling approach. Journal of Information Technology Management, 1(1), 3-18. [In Persian]
Azar, A., Gholamzadeh, R., & Qanawati, M. (2013). Path-structural modeling in management (2th ed), Tehran: Negah Danesh Publications. [In Persian]
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-10.
Breit, L. A., & Volkmann, C. K. (2024). Recent developments in entrepreneurial marketing: systematic literature review, thematic analysis and research agenda. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 26(2), 228-256. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRME-11-2022-0136
Burlton, R. T. (2019). Business process management: Profiting from ISM. Indianapolis: Sams.
Carsun, D. (2010). Interface research: A commentary on a commenter–ten years on. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 8-10.
Colla, E., & Lapoule, P. (2020). The multi-channel impact on the sales forces management. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 44(3), 248-265.
Cross, D. M., Lepage, F., & Ghosh, J. (2019). California’s Contributions to the US Export Profile. Western Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(3), 16-21.
Franco, M., de Fátima Santos, M., Ramalho, I., & Nunes, C. (2022). An Exploratory Study of Entrepreneurial Marketing in SMEs: The Role of the Founder-Entrepreneur. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 21(2), 265- 283.
Gruber, M. (2004). Marketing in New Ventures: Theory and Empirical Evidence. Schmalenbach Business Review, 56, 164-199.
Haji Gholamreza, N., & Matinpour, M. (2016). Identifying factors affecting the success of electronic businesses with electronic trust symbol in Iran. the second international conference on management and accounting, Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/642934. [In Persian]
Hamali, S. (2015). The Effect of Entrepreneurial Marketing on Business Performance: Small Garment Industry in Bandung City, Indonesia. Developing Country Studies, 5(1), 24- 30.
Javadian, G.Nair, A.Ahlstrom, D.Moghaddam, K.Chen, L.-W., & Lee, Y. (2023). Transitional entrepreneurship: unleashing entrepreneurial potential across numerous challenging contexts. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 26(2), 78-87. https://doi.org/10.1108/NEJE-12-2023-103.
Jones, R., & Rowley, J. (2011). Entrepreneurial marketing in small businesses: A conceptual exploration. International Small Business Journal, 29(1), 25-36.
Khakzadian, S., Fatahi, M., & Salehi, M. (2019). Presenting an entrepreneurial marketing model to improve innovative performance from the perspective of university faculty members: a qualitative paradigm. Journal of Law Education, 7(25), 224-254.  20.1001.1.23829613.1399.8.28.10.4. [In Persian]
Khan, H.Mavondo, F., & Zahoor, N. (2022). Integration of outside-in and inside-out entrepreneurial marketing capabilities, marketing agility and resources for entrepreneurial firm performance. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(1), https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-02-2022-0193.
Kowalik, I.Danik, L., & Pleśniak, A. (2022). Entrepreneurial marketing orientation of the Polish and Finnish SMEs and its environmental determinants. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 37(13), 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-07-2021-0333.
Li, W.Ming, H., & Song, J. (2024). Live in the present” or “focus on the future”: the effects of ambidextrous marketing capabilities on entrepreneurial performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(4), 1362-1380. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2022-0187.
Mahdi, A.Crick, D.Crick, J.M.Lamine, W., & Spence, M. (2024). A study of entrepreneurial marketing activities and firm performance in an immediate post-COVID-19 era: the moderating role of coopetition. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 30 (6), 1527-1552. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-07-2023-0743.
Maritz, A., Frederick, H. & Valos, M. (2011). A discursive approach to entrepreneurial marketing: Integrating academic and practice theory. Small Enterprise Research, 17(1): 74- 86.
Martin, D., Jovalgi, M. (2016). The entrepreneurial marketing mix. Oualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 12(4), 391‐403.
Mozafari, M., Ajali, M., & Garmei, R. (2018). The relationship between entrepreneurial orientation, marketing ability and company performance with the moderating role of competitive intensity in the field of information and communication technology and computer software. Smart Business Management Studies, 7(27), 59-102. https://doi.org/10.22054/ims.2018.9984. [In Persian]
Murray, J. (1981). Marketing is home for the entrepreneurial process. Industrial Marketing Management, 10(2), 93-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-8501(81)90002-X.
Murray, J. (2018). Market orientation and performance of export ventures: The process through marketing capabilities and competitive advantages. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 39. 252-269.
Nigam, N., & Shatila, K. (2024). Entrepreneurial intention among women entrepreneurs and the mediating effect of dynamic capabilities: empirical evidence from Lebanon. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 30(4), 916-937. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-07-2023-0690.
Nurcahyo, R., & Putra, M. I. (2020). Characteristics of Startup Company and Its Strategy: Analysis of Indonesia Fashion Startup Companies. Int. J. Eng. Technol.7, 44–47.
Pan, Y., Jackson, P., & Limburg, D. (2015). Value Creation Logics: A UK Case Study. UK Academy for Information Systems Conference Proceedings, 19(1), 293-304. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ukais2015/19.
Ren, D., Stephan, U., & Gorgievski, M. (2020). More than money: Developing an integrative multi-factorial measure of entrepreneurial success. International Small Business Journal, 34(8), 1098-1121.
Ren, G., & Aicejerik, A. R. (2018). Relationships, marketing and small business: an exploration of links in theory and practice. Qualitative Market Research, 7(3), 228-232.
Rex, D. (2021). Interface research: A commentary on a commenter–ten years on. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 8-10.
Rezaee, R., Mongoli, N., & Safa, L. (2014). Investigating the concept and dimensions of entrepreneurial marketing and its impact on small and medium businesses. Journal of Entrepreneurship Studies and Sustainable Agricultural Development, 2(2), 1-16. [In Persian]
Rizvani, M., khodadadhosseini, S,. Mohammadtaghi, T. (2018). Conceptual mapping of social capital in entrepreneurial marketing. Human Resource Management Research, 2(1), 67-90. http://ormr.modares.ac.ir/article-28-12309-fa.html. [In Persian]
Robledo, S.Vasquez, J. E.Duque-Méndez, N. D., & Duque-Uribe, V. (2023). Networking as an entrepreneurial marketing tool: the link between effectuation and word of mouth. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 25(2), 270-285. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRME-08-2020-0112.
Sahu, C. K., & Panda, R. K. (2024). Entrepreneurial marketing practices and manufacturing venture performance during a pandemic: the mediating role of innovation. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 45(2), 413-422. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-07-2022-0312.
Sarv. F., & Mingk, R. (2003). e-loyalty-ElusiveIdealor Competitive Edge?. Communication of ACM,46,184-191.
Sebora, H. (2009). Contingent reward transactional leadership, work attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of procedural justice climate perceptions and strength, The Leadership Quarterly. 19(3), PP. 251-265.
Simpson, M., Taylor, N., & Padmore, J. (2022). Marketing in SME: an Introduction. Entrepreneurship Marketing Principle and Practice of SME Marketing. Routledge, 1-10.
Stamler, B. (2001). Companies are developing brand messages as a way to inspire loyalty among employees. New York Times, 21(3), 42-72.
Sun, Y., & Lee, E. (2022). Entrepreneurial marketing of small and medium-sized suppliers enhancing technological capability: lessons from industrial suppliers in South Korea. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 54, 511-524,. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-01-2022-0026.
Sutikno, S. (2019). Physics Learning Integrated Science, Technology, Entrepreneurship. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Scientific Research, 2 (12), 1- 16. 10.31426/ijamsr.2019.2.12.2511.
Sutiksno, D. U., Ahmar, A. S., Makasar, U. N., Setyawati, I. I., Noch, I. M. Y., & Pattiasina, V. (2019). Market Orientation and Distinctive Competence Toward Service Mix On Study Programs Of Higher Education In Maluku, Indonesia. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 22(1), 1-5.
Troise, C.Tani, M.Matricano, D., & Ferrara, E. (2022). Guest editorial: Digital transformation, strategic management and entrepreneurial process: dynamics. challenges and opportunities, Journal of Strategy and Management, 15(3), 329-334. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-08-2022-363.
Walker, M. (2015). Europe Inc. gets an about-face from politicians. The Wall Street Journal, April 20, sec. A.
Wijekoon, S.O'Cass, A., & Vesal, M. (2024). The impact of entrepreneurial marketing on new venture brand image and performance: a capability perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 61(4), 76-91. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-07-2022-0568.
Yaghoubi Farani, A., Mohammadalipor Malekshah, I., Karimi, S., & Abdollahzadeh, G. (2023). The effect of entrepreneurial marketing on greenhouse performance in Mazandaran province. Journal of Entrepreneurship Research, 1 (2), 57-70. doi: 10.22034/JER.2022.698502. [In Persian]
Zarei, B., & Fatemi, M. (2009). Identifying factors affecting the success and failure of internet businesses in Iran. The first annual conference of management, innovation and entrepreneurship. https://civilica.com/doc/108278. [In Persian]
Zhu, X., Liu, Y., He, M., Luo, D., & Wu., Y. (2019). Entrepreneurship and industrial clusters: evidence from China industrial census.  Small Bus Econ, 52,595–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9974-3.

  • تاریخ دریافت 18 تیر 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 01 دی 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 01 دی 1403