مجله پژوهش‌های کارآفرینی

مجله پژوهش‌های کارآفرینی

کارآفرینی به‌مثابه گردونه بی‌مهار: تأملی انتقادی بر پیامدهای خطی و ریزومی تجارب کارآفرینانه

نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی

نویسنده
گروه آموزشی علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران. ایران.
چکیده
مقدمه: مطالعات کارآفرینی، متأثر از گزاره‌های اقتصاد نئولیبرال و با اتخاذ رویکردی خطی، بیشتر بر دستاوردهای مادی و ابزاری کارآفرینی متمرکز شده‌اند. مفروضۀ بنیادین این مقاله، متأثر از گزاره‌های نظری جامعه‌شناسی انتقادی، عبارت است از اینکه کارآفرینی پدیده‌ای «دگرزا» با پیامدهای «قصدناشده» است و می‌تواند برای گروه‌های مختلف اثرات متفاوتی داشته باشد. به‌منظور بررسی این مفروضه، پیامدهای تجربۀ کارآفرینانۀ شرکت‌های تعاونی ایستگاه‌های پمپاژ آب در شهرستان دره‌شهر استان ایلام مورد مطالعه قرار گرفته است.
روش‌شناسی: پژوهش حاضر از نوع تحقیقات ارزیابی است. به این منظور، با تغییر کاربرد روش پستل، درصدد مطالعۀ پیامدهای تجربۀ کارآفرینی مذکور برای محیط پیرامون برآمده است. بدین منظور ابتدا با استفاده از مصاحبه‌های نیمه ساختاریافته تا نیل به اشباع نظری، با ۲۲ نفر متشکل از خبرگان و ذی‌نفعان مصاحبه شد تا پیامدهای تجربۀ کارآفرینی مورد مطالعه، اکتشاف گرددد.
یافته‌ها: تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌های تحقیق نشان داد که تجربۀ کارآفرینی مورد مطالعه، برخلاف منطق خطی حاکم بر مطالعات کارآفرینی که تنها بر پیامد سودآوری و اشتغال‌زایی تأکید داشته‌اند، دارای پیامدهای مثبت و منفی در حوزه‌های مختلف سیاسی، اقتصادی، اجتماعی، زیست‌محیطی، تکنولوژی و حقوقی است. این تجربۀ کارآفرینی با پیامدهای مثبتی همچون ایجاد درآمدزایی، تأسیس صنایع جانبی و تبدیلی، حفظ همبستگی اجتماعی، ماندگاری جمعیت، تقویت روحیۀ سخت‌کوشی، گسترش فعالیت‌های فرهنگی و هنری، کاهش نارضایتی سیاسی، ارتقای مهارت فنی ذی‌نفعان، هوشمند سازی مدیریت آب، تعریف زمین به‌عنوان آورده بانکی برای اعضای تعاونی‌ها و کاهش آلودگی محیط‌زیستی همراه بوده است. با این حال، فقدان نظارت و مدیریت در دهۀ گذشته سبب بروز پیامدهای نامطلوبی همچون نابرابری اجتماعی، انحصاری شدن آب، هدر رفت آب مجازی و شور شدن اراضی گردیده است.
نتیجه‌گیری / دستاوردها: این مطالعه با ایجاد حساسیت نسبت به پیامدهای کارآفرینی نشان داده است که کارآفرینی به‌مثابۀ امری «ریزومی» قابل توضیح است؛ زیرا به‌صورت هم‌زمان می‌تواند اثرات مطلوب و نامطلوب بر ابعاد مختلف محیط پیرامون خود داشته باشد؛ از افزایش همبستگی، ماندگاری جمعیت و رفاه گرفته تا ایجاد نابرابری، استثمار و آلودگی‌های محیط‌زیستی. به‌عبارتی دیگر، کنش‌های کارآفرینانه به‌جای آنکه نقطه پایان تلقی شوند، باید نقطه آغازهای متکثر، پیش‌بینی نشده و نامشخص محسوب شوند. هدف این مقاله تخطئه کارآفرینی نیست؛ بلکه طرح مواجهۀ انتقادی با کارآفرینی به‌منظور نوید تحقق صورتی «انسانی‌تر» و «عادلانه‌تر» از کارآفرینی و همچنین طرح پیوند «سیاست کارآفرینی» با «سیاست رهایی‌بخش» در جهت رفع نابرابری و «سیاست زندگی» است؛ یعنی تلاش برای توسعۀ امکانات برخورداری و زندگی رضایت‌بخش برای همگان و در نهایت طرح این پرسش که چگونه می‌توان کارآفرینی را به عملی «اخلاقی» مبدل ساخت؟
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Entrepreneurship as an Unbridled Wheel: A Critical Reflection on the Linear and Rhizomatic Implications of Entrepreneurial Experiences

نویسنده English

Ali Ayar
Department of Social Sciences Education, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Introduction: Entrepreneurial studies, largely shaped by neoliberal economic discourse, have predominantly adopted a linear analytical lens, focusing on the material and instrumental outcomes of entrepreneurship. Challenging this orthodox view, the present article draws upon critical sociology to advance the foundational premise that entrepreneurship is inherently a transformative and heterogenetic phenomenon, carrying unintended consequences that differentially affect various social groups. To empirically examine this proposition, the study investigates the multifaceted consequences of entrepreneurial experience-specifically, the cooperative water-pumping stations in Dareh Shahr County, Ilam Province, Iran.
Methodology: This evaluation research adapts and repurposes the POSTEL framework to systematically assess the consequences of the aforementioned entrepreneurial initiative for its surrounding environment. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews conducted with 22 participants, comprising both key informants and stakeholders, and continued until theoretical saturation was achieved.
Findings: Contrary to the conventional linear narrative that reduces entrepreneurial outcomes to profitability and employment generation, the findings reveal a complex constellation of both positive and negative repercussions spanning political, economic, social, environmental, technological, and legal domains. On the positive side, the entrepreneurial experience contributed to income generation, the emergence of ancillary and processing industries, reinforcement of social cohesion, population retention, cultivation of a work ethic, expansion of cultural and artistic activities, mitigation of political dissatisfaction, enhancement of stakeholders' technical competencies, smartification of water resource management, and the financial innovation of defining land as bank collateral for cooperative members, alongside a reduction in environmental pollution. However, a decade of insufficient oversight and governance has simultaneously precipitated adverse outcomes, including growing social inequality, monopolization of water resources, wastage of virtual water, and progressive soil salinization.
Conclusion/Implications: By cultivating analytical sensitivity toward the heterogeneous consequences of entrepreneurship, this article demonstrates that entrepreneurial activity is best understood through a rhizomatic lens-capable of producing simultaneous and often contradictory effects on its milieu, ranging from solidarity, demographic stability, and welfare enhancement, to inequality, exploitation, and ecological degradation. In this light, entrepreneurial actions should be conceived not as terminal endpoints, but as multiple, unpredictable, and indeterminate points of departure. The intent here is not to denigrate entrepreneurship, but to advocate for a critical engagement with it-one that envisions a more humane and more equitable entrepreneurial praxis. This entails forging conceptual and practical linkages between entrepreneurship policy, emancipatory politics (to redress inequalities), and life politics (to expand capabilities for a flourishing life for all). Ultimately, the article poses a foundational ethical question: How can entrepreneurship be reconstituted as a thoroughly ethical practice?

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Entrepreneurship
Critical Sociology
Entrepreneurial Consequences
Critical Entrepreneurship Studies
Ahmadpour Daraiani, M. (2012). Entrepreneurship: Definitions, theory and models. Tehran: Jajarmi. [In Persian]
Alavizadeh, S. (2017). Entrepreneurship and its role in sustainable rural development (Case study of Ilam province). Ilam Culture, 56-55(18), 154-170. [In Persian]
Alizadeh Moghadam, S., Kord Naeij, A., Khodad Hosseini, S., & Mohammadian, A. (2023). A conceptual model of digital transformation strategy formation in clothing retail organizations. Quarterly Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 16(4), 82-115. https://doi.org/10.22059/jed.2023.366608.654278 [In Persian]
Anbari, M., & Ayar, A. (2024). Interwoven in meta-economics: An analysis of economic action in Iran. Sociological Studies (Former Journal of Social Sciences), 31(1), 167-189. https://doi.org/10.22059/jsr.2024.372115.1945 [In Persian]
Atkins, R., Cook, L., & Seamans, R. (2022). Discrimination in lending? Evidence from the paycheck protection program. Small Business Economics, 58(2), 843-865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00533-1
Ayar, A. (2025). The paradoxical coexistence of effort and poverty: An ethnographic study of the intertwining of economic action and poverty in the Middle Zagros. Postdoctoral Project, University of Tehran: Institute of Social Studies and Research, University of Tehran. [In Persian]
Davari, I., Ranjbar, M., & Tavaklan, A. (2023). Entrepreneurship and its role in rural economic development with emphasis on the role of tourism (Case study: East Azerbaijan Province). Geographical Engineering of the Land, 7(2), 351-366. https://doi.org/10.2034/jget.2023.147995 [In Persian]
Delbari, S. (2022). Entrepreneurial capacities in religious tourism and its cultural and social benefits. Journal of Entrepreneurship Research, 1(2), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.22034/jer.2023.1972620.1012 [In Persian]
Deleuze, G. (1988). Spinoza: Practical philosophy. City Lights Books.
Eberhart, R., Aldrich, H. E., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2022). Entrepreneurialism and society: An introduction. In Entrepreneurialism and Society: New Theoretical Perspectives. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20220000081001
Emami, M., & Karbasion, M. (2025). The Interaction between Women’s Social Entrepreneurship in Iran and Structuraland Cultural Factors: Applying Giddens’ Structuration Theory. Scientific-Research Quarterly of Social Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Shushtar Branch, 19(2), 69-93. https://ensani.ir/file/download/article/1773138024-69aff06878263-9861-1404-9.pdf [In Persian]
Farhadi, K., & Mirzaei, M. (2017). Photographic entrepreneurship: A phenomenological inquiry into indigenous entrepreneurship. Welfare and Social Development Planning, 8(31), 117-167. https://doi.org/10.22054/qjsd.2017.8251 [In Persian]
Ghazeli, F., Hosseini Shakib, M., & Khamseh, A. (2025). Resilience model of businesses based on social entrepreneurship: A mixed research. Journal of Entrepreneurship Research, 4(1), 93-114. https://doi.org/10.22034/jer.2024.2032478.1137 [In Persian]
Giddens, A. (1997). The consequences of modernity (M. Salasi, Trans.). Tehran: Markaz Publishing House. [In Persian]
Hidalgo, G., Monticelli, J. M., & Vargas Bortolaso, I. (2024). Social capital as a driver of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 15(1), 182-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2021.1951819
Imani, A., Sedaghati Mokhtari, S., & Mohammadi, Z. (2025). Developing a policy model for entrepreneurship development in the Imam Khomeini Relief Committee of Sistan and Baluchestan Province. Journal of Entrepreneurship Research, 3(4), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.22034/jer.2024.715355 [In Persian]
Kazemi, Z., Askarifar, K., & Ebrahimi, A. (2024). Identifying marketing capabilities in the life cycle of new businesses. Quarterly Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 17(1), 162-191. https://doi.org/10.22059/jed.2024.370261.654313 [In Persian]
Li, J. (2021). The somaesthetics of the multitude: The politico-aesthetic logic of Antonio Negri and Michael Hardt in constructing the subjecthood. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 41(2), 211-224. https://tsla.researchcommons.org/journal/vol41/iss2/21
Moghimi, S. F., Shirvani-Jozani, A., & Alipour-Darvish, Z. (2019). Analysis of the phenomenon of influenza and entrepreneurial avoidance mentality among children of entrepreneurs (Using data-based theory). Quarterly Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 13(4), 581-600. https://doi.org/10.22059/jed.2020.310142.653458 [In Persian]
Mohammdpour, A. (2017). A philosophical narrative of history: From Herodotus to Alain Badiou. Tehran: Logos. [In Persian]
Naderi, N., Khosravi, E., & Karmian, F. (2024). The organization pattern of street child labor in Kermanshah province: Providing recommendations based on the development of entrepreneurial skills. Journal of Entrepreneurship Research, 3(1), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.22034/jer.2023.563461.1005 [In Persian]
Nolan, P., & Lenski, G. (2008). Human societies: An introduction to macrosociology (N. Moafaqian, Trans.). Tehran: Nei Publications.
Nouri, M., Saymohammadi, S., & Shiri, N. (2023). Strategic analysis of the development of healthy agricultural businesses in Ilam province. Journal of Entrepreneurship Research, 2(4), 83-99. https://doi.org/10.22034/jer.2024.2020349.1076 [In Persian]
Pourjamshidi, H., Rezaei, B., & Naderi, N. (2022). Designing a conceptual model of barriers to the development of business coaching in the Iranian market. Quarterly Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 15(4), 615-624. https://doi.org/10.22059/jed.2022.344622.653984 [In Persian]
Ramzbari, N., Fazalzadeh, A., Naqdi, S., & Ahmadian, V. (2023). Challenges facing the development of FinTech business models: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 16(2), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.22059/jed.2023.340654.653923 [In Persian]
Reid, S. R. M. (2018). Critical perspectives on entrepreneurship: Challenging dominant discourses. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 18(1), S109-S111. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2018.1503093
Ritzer, G. (2013). Contemporary sociological theory and classical roots (K. Mirzaei & A. Baghaei Sarabi, Trans.). Tehran: Jameshnasan. [In Persian]
Rostamian, A., & Motavasali, M. (2024). Hermeneutic praxeology and entrepreneurial action. Quarterly Scientific Research Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 17(3), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.22059/jed.2024.364827.654265 [In Persian]
Shayani Majd, D. (2025). Studying the rhizomatic concept from Gilles Deleuze's perspective in interactive performance directing. Advanced Studies of Art Quarterly, 7(13), 73-88. http://art-studies.ir/article-1-154-fa.html [In Persian]
Swedberg, R. (2005). The economic sociology of capitalism: An introduction and agenda. In V. Nee & R. Swedberg (Eds.). The economic sociology of capitalism, 1-26. Princeton University Press.
Taheri, A., & Bashkoh, M. (2023). Identifying the effective drivers of digital marketing in the entry of women covered by the relief committee into home businesses. Quarterly Scientific Research Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 16(5), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.22059/jed.2024.369121.654300 [In Persian]
Tedmanson, D., Verduyn, K., Essers, C., & Gartner, W. B. (2012). Critical perspectives in entrepreneurship research. Organization, 19(5), 531-541. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508412458495
Uyurkulak, S. (2023). The political ontology of Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 33(1), 125-134. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2500764#3#1
Verduyn, K. (2015). Entrepreneuring and process: A Lefebvrian perspective. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 33(6), 638-648. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242614559059
Verduyn, K., Dey, P., & Tedmanson, D. (2017). A critical understanding of entrepreneurship. Review of Entrepreneurship, 1(17), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.3917/entre.161.0037
Verduyn, K., Dey, P., Essers, C., & Tedmanson, D. (2014). Emancipation and/or oppression? Conceptualizing dimensions of criticality in entrepreneurship studies. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508412458495
Weiss, T., Eberhart, R., Lounsbury, M., Nelson, A., Rindova, V., Meyer, J., Bromley, P., Atkins, R., Ruebottom, T., Jennings, J., Jennings, D., Toubiana, M., Slade Shantz, A., Khorasani, N., Wadhwani, D., Tucker, H., Kirsch, D., Goldfarb, B., Aldrich, H., & Aldrich, D. (2023). The social effects of entrepreneurship on society and some potential remedies: Four provocations. Journal of Management Inquiry, 32(4), 251-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/10564926231181555
Zamani Jamshidi, M., & Sharifzade, R. (2017). Rhizome-network: A comparative study of Gilles Deleuze and Bruno Latour's ontology. Knowledge, 77(1), 159-184. [In Persian]
Zeighami, R. (2010). Rhizomatic thought and nursing. Iranian Journal of Nursing, 23(66), 32-42. http://ijn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-868-fa.html [In Persian]

  • تاریخ دریافت 28 مهر 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 03 دی 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 04 دی 1404